data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e01a/9e01a4490df05f490b93ebb7f0499e73346bfe53" alt="Michael flanel rpm life planner software"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c198/6c1985a901dec0baff7d839c771577900fad2659" alt="michael flanel rpm life planner software michael flanel rpm life planner software"
Keywords: PPACA, Private Health Insurance etc. The money collected is used to finance the Obama care program so that all the healthcare facilities that offer the Obama Care services are well equipped with equipment and skilled medical practitioners. According to the constitution, it is also the role of the government to collect the taxes from the wealthy, healthcare industries and private healthcare centers. This means that the government takes the money that has been collected and redistributes it to the various states to finance specific projects that will ensure the population receives the healthcare they need and in return more money is collected from the increase in the increased number of those that come to seek healthcare. The Constitution states that it is the government’s role to fund the states with money to expand Medicaid to help cover the ever-increasing number of the insured population. This has placed the redistribution policy’s weight on other sides more than others. The numbers of healthcare practitioners are not enough to handle the number of people. Research has shown that the facilities have not been sufficient for the ever-increasing volumes of those applying for the PPACA. The fact that there are more volumes of people applying for the insurance cover, means more cash to take care of the facilities and services that will be at use or at least this is the way the officers in charge of health insurance thought it would be when they were for the idea. Keywords: ObamaCare, Population Implications etc.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3feff/3feff45ab32eb6c8ab610614a41081c43616ae01" alt="michael flanel rpm life planner software michael flanel rpm life planner software"
The ethical concern created under this is that the bundled payments remove the incentives to overtreat the patient while also creating unwarranted incentives to undertreat. On the other hand, if their costs are more than the bundled payment, they are compelled to absorb the loss. Essentially, this shows that if the hospitals or doctors treat a patient for less than the preferred bundle, they will retain the excess amount. This means that the hospitals and physicians receive fixed sums for the treatment of a patient’s condition irrespective of the costs incurred by the providers. It must be noted that ObamaCare offers bundled payment model in place of fee for service models (O'Connor et al, 2013). However, one ethical concern that has emerged over time and needs to be addressed by healthcare administrators is that doctors face the prospect of enhanced incentives for undertreatment rather than overtreatment. ObamaCare was enacted to control the cost of health care in the United States, with its main aim being to bring the costs incurred by patients down.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e01a/9e01a4490df05f490b93ebb7f0499e73346bfe53" alt="Michael flanel rpm life planner software"